It seems that the Panelists at WIPO are finding Complainants and their attorneys guilty of Abuse of the UDRP Process, known as Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH), more than ever before.
So, we are starting a SHAMING of all those who knowingly file Complaints that they can’t (or shouldn’t) win as well as their attorneys who should know better. It seems that some of them SHOULD know better and yet a number of them just do not have a clue as to the requirements of the UDRP Process, thereby causing unsuspecting domain registrants to have to expend funds to safeguard their domains.
3/27/21 COMPLAINANT: Biohacks GmbH – ATTORNEY: Horak, Attorneys at Law
4/10/21 COMPLAINANT: Vances Foods, Inc. – ATTORNEY: Burton Law Firm
5/5/21 COMPLAINANT: Majid Al Futtaim Properties, LLC – ATTORNEY: Talal Abu Ghazaleh Legal
5/11/21 COMPLAINANT: Levio Consulting, Inc. – ATTORNEY: Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren, sc
5/15/21 COMPLAINANT: Jean-MarieLoirat & Kinetic Sport – ATTORNEY: GBA Avocats
5/29/21 COMPLAINANT: J & J Calder Co. – ATTORNEY: IP Wealth Pty, Ltd.
6/2/21 COMPLAINANT: Damstra Technology – ATTORNEY: Rankin Business Lawyers
6/2/21 COMPLAINANT: Reboxed Ltd. – ATTORNEY: Sheridans, UK
6/4/21 COMPLAINANT: Affirm, Inc. – ATTORNEY: DLA Piper, Australia
6/14/21 COMPLAINANT: Software Koi Box, SL – Self represented
6/15/21 COMPLAINANT: Energy Square – ATTORNEY: Walter Billet Avocats, France
6/18/21 COMPLAINANT: Machani Infra Development Corp. – ATTORNEY: IndusLaw, India
6/18/21 COMPLAINANT: Maharishi Foundation, USA – ATTORNEY: Shuttleworth & Ingersoll P.L.C.
Howard Neu, Esq.
The Neu Facebook