Count former President Bill Clinton among those who are skeptical of the new Obama administration plan to give up Internet oversight authority.
Clinton talked in some detail about why the U.S. should retain oversight over Internet domain names and addresses during a panel at a weekend meeting sponsored by the Clinton Global Initiative. Noting that the Edward Snowden revelations of National Security Agency data collections has given “new energy” to the belief internationally that the U.S. should not even be in “nominal control of domain names,” Clinton argued that the U.S. has still done a pretty good job of keeping the Internet open and free.
“A lot of people … have been trying to take this authority from the U.S. for the sole purpose of cracking down on Internet freedom and limiting it and having governments protect their backsides instead of empowering their people,” Clinton said during a panel discussion Friday night.
Opponents of the Obama administration’s plan — mostly Republicans, so far — are likely to cheer the former president’s remarks, since they too have some concerns about giving up what little control the U.S. has over the Internet. Clinton’s remarks may make it that much harder for the Obama administration to say their plan has widespread support.
A week after the Obama administration revealed plans to give up some Internet oversight, U.S. officials were still arguing that critics misunderstand their plan. “Some critics have claimed that this move opens the door for certain authoritarian states to somehow seize control of the Internet, blocking free speech and inhibiting a multitude of legitimate activity,” two administration officials wrote Friday. ”Nothing could be further from the truth.”
The Obama administration has proposed giving up its oversight of domain names and Internet addresses managed by ICANN. Obama administration officials have proposed handing U.S. oversight authority to the “global multistakeholder community” by 2015, when ICANN’s current contract with the U.S. government is set to expire.
Opponents of the plan worry that countries such as China and Russia could gain more control over Internet functions through global bodies such as the United Nations. Obama administration officials said they won’t turn over the keys to a “government-led or an inter-governmental organization,” such as the UN or its telecommunications arm.
Clinton said Saturday that he’s not convinced the multi-stakeholder model is the way to go.
“I understand in theory why we would like to have a multi-stakeholder process. I favor that,” Clinton said. “I just know that a lot of these so-called multi-stakeholders are really governments that want to gag people and restrict access to the internet.”
ICANN members argue there needs to be more respect for local cultures on the Internet. That could lead to censorship of content, which is something the U.S. has tried to prevent except in instances where content is illegal (such as child pornography).
This seems to be another instance of the Obama administration ceding authority and power from our country to others.
Thanks to Amy Schatz and Recode.net, and
Thanks for “listening”
Howard
@chad
Image when your getting sued in
brazilUSA because they have rights to the .com and ICANN updates it rules. Its the biggest mistake with the biggest impact – to the freedom of the Internet for all people in the world! Just saying. 😉@Clinton quote
Really??
I don’t think nor do I believe countries like Canada, Japan, South Korea, Nederlands, France, UK, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, in fact majority of Europe, Oceania many parts of Asia the America’s Africa’s etc plus elsewhere want to gag people and restrict access to the Internet as these countries too rely on it’s stability and freedom it provides for it’s citizens.
It’s obvious that Obama is truly thinking for freedom on a global scale here and in keeping with the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) – on request of Tim Berners-Lee original premise that the “world wide web should be and will be free to all without patenting it nor controlling it though other means”.
The www although only one element to the Internet as a whole, is still the most popular trafficked region by which all domains web pages are accessed, remember that folks!
Clinton is right and personally do not like the Obama administration now as this will be the biggest risk the internet and domain owners have faced ever. Image when your getting sued in brazil because they have rights to the .com and ICANN updates it rules. Its the biggest mistake with the biggest impact. If you have the biggest weapon and trillions of commerce flowing, why give control of that up?
Correct. US should maintain control if we want to maintain freedom of speech on the internet. But Obama isnt so much interested in free speech. Ask the NSA, IRS, etc etc